@article {Aparasu:Number 3/July-September 2005:1040-1237:147, author = "Aparasu, Rajender", author = "Bhatara, Vinod", author = "Gupta, Sanjay", title = "U.S. National Trends in the Use of Antipsychotics During Office Visits, 19982002", journal = "Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (after Jan 1, 2004)", volume = "17", year = "Number 3/July-September 2005", abstract = "Background . There is a paucity of studies on U.S. national trends in the use of antipsychotic medications in the 21st century. This study examined national trends in the prescribing of antipsychotic drugs in office-based physician practices. Methods . National probability sample survey data from 1998–2002 National Ambulatory Medical Surveys were used to analyze the prescribing trends. The weighted visit estimates and percentages were compared across the years using z-test. Results . The number of antipsychotic-related visits was found to increase significantly and nearly two-fold, from 4.6 million in 1998 to 8.6 million in 2002. During the same period, the number of visits for second-generation antipsychotic drugs nearly tripled. The proportion of visits for the second-generation agents, as a percentage of visits for all antipsychotic drugs, rose sharply from about 48% in 1998 to 84% in 2002. Correspondingly, the percentage of visits involving first-generation antipsychotic drugs declined. The growth in the number of visits involving antipsychotic drugs over the 5-year period was substantial (120%) in visits with non-psychiatrist physicians, but not in visits involving psychiatrists. Conclusions . The trend of growth in prescription of antipsychotic drugs in office visits, accounted by increased use of second-generation antipsychotics, has persisted into the 21st century. Increased prescribing of these agents by non-psychiatrists is also apparently fueling this trend. This trend of shift from first-to-second generation antipsychotic agents, though not unambiguously supported by extant safety and efficacy data, is endorsed by guidelines based on expert-consensus and limited data. Given the high-level use of second-generation drugs, more practical studies of these drugs, focusing on effectiveness or long-term outcomes, are needed.", pages = "147-152(6)", url = "http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tandf/uacp/2005/00000017/00000003/art00005" doi = "doi:10.1080/10401230591002084" }