Development of an unbiased method for the estimation of liver steatosis

Authors: Fiorini, Ryan N; Kirtz, Jeremy1; Periyasamy, Basker1; Evans, Zachary; Haines, Julia K1; Cheng, Gang1; Polito, Carmen1; Rodwell, David1; Shafizadeh, Stephen F1; Zhou, Xin1; Campbell, Crystal1; Birsner, Jennifer1; Schmidt, Michael2; Lewin, David3; Chavin, Kenneth D

Source: Clinical Transplantation, Volume 18, Number 6, December 2004 , pp. 700-706(7)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Fiorini RN, Kirtz J, Periyasamy B, Evans Z, Haines JK, Cheng G, Polito C, Rodwell D, Shafizadeh SF, Zhou X, Campbell C, Birsner J, Schmidt M, Lewin D, Chavin KD. Development of an unbiased method for the estimation of liver steatosis.

Clin Transplant 2004 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00282.x

© Blackwell Munksgaard, 2004 Abstract:  Background: 

Steatosis significantly contributes to an organ's transplantability. Livers with >30% fat content have a 25% chance of developing primary non-function (PNF). The current practice of evaluating a hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained donor biopsy by visual interpretation is subjective. We hypothesized that H&E staining of frozen sections fails to accurately estimate the degree of steatosis present within a given liver biopsy. To address this problem of evaluating steatosis in prospective donor organs, we developed a fast, user friendly computer methodology to objectively assess fat content based on the differential quantification of color pixels in Oil Red O (ORO) stained liver biopsies. Methods: 

The accuracy of human visual estimation of fat content by H&E and ORO stains was compared with computer-based measurements of the same slides from 25 frozen sections of donor biopsies. Results: 

Samples with a fat content >20% showed marked variation between human interpretation and computer analysis. There was also a significant difference in the human interpretation of fat based on the method of staining. This difference ranged from 3 to 37% with H&E. Discussion: 

Use of ORO resulted in a more consistent estimation of liver steatosis compared with H&E, but human interpretations failed to correlate with computer measurements. Such differences in fat content estimations might result in the rejection of a potentially transplantable organ or the acceptance of a marginal one. Ideally, our protocol can rapidly be applied to clinical practice for accurate and consistent measurement of fat in liver sections for the ultimate purpose of increasing the number of successful transplantable organs.

Keywords: liver; steatosis; transplant

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00282.x

Affiliations: 1:  Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) 2:  Department of Microbiology and Immunology, MUSC 3:  Department of Pathology, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.16 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A