Can nonstandardized bitewing radiographs be used to assess the presence of alveolar bone loss in epidemiologic studies?
Authors: Anwar T. Merchant; Waranuch Pitiphat; Jessica Parker1; Kaumudi Joshipura; Mary Kellerman2; Chester W. Douglass
Source: Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, Volume 32, Number 4, August 2004 , pp. 271-276(6)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Abstract:
Merchant AT, Pitiphat W, Parker J, Joshipura K, Kellerman M, Douglass CW. Can nonstandardized bitewing radiographs be used to assess the presence of alveolar bone loss in epidemiologic studies? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32: 2716. © Blackwell Munksgaard, 2004 Abstract Objective: To compare periodontitis-associated alveolar bone loss assessment by standardized and nonstandardized radiographs in clinical and epidemiologic studies Methods: Participants included 37 patients aged 2166 years with prior nonstandardized bitewing radiographs scheduled to receive bitewing radiographs as part of their next routine dental care visit. Standardized bitewing radiographs were taken with a Rinn film holder to position the film in the mouth and align the X-rays so that they were at 90° to the film. Before taking the radiograph the bite was registered in centric relation using a polyether impression material. One registered dental hygienist took and processed all the standardized radiographs. One dentist read all radiographs using a viewing box, magnifying lens, and periodontal probe with William's markings. Radiographic bone loss was measured to the closest millimeter at mesial and distal sites of the posterior teeth excluding third molars. The examining dentist was blinded to the participant's name, age, gender, or if the radiograph was standardized or nonstandardized. Results: Mean bone loss (±SD) was similar in the standardized and nonstandardized groups (1.60 ± 0.72 mm versus 1.64 ± 0.85 mm), and the correlation was high (r=0.95). Periodontitis was defined as present if the participant had at least one site with 3, 4 and 5 mm bone loss. The Kappa statistics for concordance using these three cutoffs were good and ranged from 0.60 to 0.65. The sensitivity ranged from 72.7 to 80.8% and specificity from 88.5 to 90.9%. Conclusions: Periodontitis assessed as mean alveolar bone loss or the prevalence of disease based on alveolar bone loss can be accurately and reliably evaluated from nonstandardized radiographs.Keywords: bitewing; epidemiologic study; nonstandardized radiograph; periodontitis assessment; sensitivity and specificity; standardized radiograph
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00162.x
Affiliations: 1: Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, USA 2: Cambridge Health Alliance Dental Clinic, Cambridge, MA, USA

Click here for Page Help