Can nonstandardized bitewing radiographs be used to assess the presence of alveolar bone loss in epidemiologic studies?

Authors: Anwar T. Merchant; Waranuch Pitiphat; Jessica Parker1; Kaumudi Joshipura; Mary Kellerman2; Chester W. Douglass

Source: Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, Volume 32, Number 4, August 2004 , pp. 271-276(6)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Merchant AT, Pitiphat W, Parker J, Joshipura K, Kellerman M, Douglass CW. Can nonstandardized bitewing radiographs be used to assess the presence of alveolar bone loss in epidemiologic studies? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32: 271–6. © Blackwell Munksgaard, 2004 Abstract – Objective:

To compare periodontitis-associated alveolar bone loss assessment by standardized and nonstandardized radiographs in clinical and epidemiologic studies Methods:

Participants included 37 patients aged 21–66 years with prior nonstandardized bitewing radiographs scheduled to receive bitewing radiographs as part of their next routine dental care visit. Standardized bitewing radiographs were taken with a Rinn film holder to position the film in the mouth and align the X-rays so that they were at 90° to the film. Before taking the radiograph the bite was registered in centric relation using a polyether impression material. One registered dental hygienist took and processed all the standardized radiographs. One dentist read all radiographs using a viewing box, magnifying lens, and periodontal probe with William's markings. Radiographic bone loss was measured to the closest millimeter at mesial and distal sites of the posterior teeth excluding third molars. The examining dentist was blinded to the participant's name, age, gender, or if the radiograph was standardized or nonstandardized. Results:

Mean bone loss (±SD) was similar in the standardized and nonstandardized groups (1.60 ± 0.72 mm versus 1.64 ± 0.85 mm), and the correlation was high (r=0.95). Periodontitis was defined as present if the participant had at least one site with 3, 4 and 5 mm bone loss. The Kappa statistics for concordance using these three cutoffs were good and ranged from 0.60 to 0.65. The sensitivity ranged from 72.7 to 80.8% and specificity from 88.5 to 90.9%. Conclusions:

Periodontitis assessed as mean alveolar bone loss or the prevalence of disease based on alveolar bone loss can be accurately and reliably evaluated from nonstandardized radiographs.

Keywords: bitewing; epidemiologic study; nonstandardized radiograph; periodontitis assessment; sensitivity and specificity; standardized radiograph

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00162.x

Affiliations: 1: Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, USA 2: Cambridge Health Alliance Dental Clinic, Cambridge, MA, USA

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.16 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A