Flowcytometric analysis of basophil counts in human blood and inaccuracy of hematology analyzers

Authors: Ducrest, S.; Meier, F.; Tschopp, C.; Pavlovic, R.; Dahinden, C. A.

Source: Allergy, Volume 60, Number 11, November 2005 , pp. 1446-1450(5)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Background: 

Differential leukocyte counts are of proven clinical value, but information about basophil counts in normal and disease conditions is scarce although basophils are regarded as key effector cells in allergy. Aims: 

To establish and validate flowcytometric methods for counting basophils in peripheral human blood, to determine reference values, and to examine the accuracy of two widely used hematology analyzers. Methods: 

Basophils were measured in whole blood by flowcytometry after staining with antibodies against the IL-3-receptor (CD123) or the eotaxin-receptor (CCR3) combined with other markers used for gating or validation purposes. Results: 

The basophil percentages in 95 healthy adults showed an excellent correlation between the two independent flowcytometric methods, demonstrating that both are accurate and precise. The most robust maker is CCR3, which seems to be sufficient to specifically identify basophils. Normal values of relative and absolute blood basophils counts were 0.22-1.28% and 0.014-0.087 G/L (95% reference intervals), respectively. Basophil counts measured with two hematology analyzers Coulter GEN-S and ADVIA-120 showed no correlation between these instruments. Comparing the data obtained by flowcytometry and the analyzers demonstrate that basophil counts of the GEN-S are erratic, while the ADVIA-120 gives at least an estimation of true basophil numbers. Conclusions: 

We provide a solid description and validation of a novel and rapid method for the flowcytometric enumeration of basophil in whole blood. The fact that the most heavily used Hematology autoanalyzer gives completely erroneous results could explain why basophils counts have not yet received recognition as a clinically useful diagnostic marker.

Keywords: basophils; chemokines; facs analysis; immunoglobulin E; in vitro tests

Document Type: Short communication

DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00910.x

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.16 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A