IngentaConnect Decision making in a life-threatening cerebral condition: a compa...

Abstract:

Aim:

To study the support for the arguments of neurosurgeons and intensive care unit (ICU) physicians for and against life-sustaining treatment of critically ill patients, and whether neurosurgeons are less inclined to emphasize quality-of-life aspects than ICU physicians. Methods:

A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of ICU physicians in Sweden (n= 298) and all neurosurgeons in Sweden (n= 112). The respondents evaluated and prioritized different arguments for and against withholding neurosurgery, withdrawing life-sustaining treatment and providing drugs which may hasten death. Results:

The response rate was 62.5% for neurosurgeons and 73.5% for ICU physicians. Quality-of-life aspects were stressed as an important argument by the majority of both neurosurgeons and ICU physicians (76.8% vs. 54.0%); however, significantly more neurosurgeons regarded this argument as the most important (P < 0.001). A minority in both groups, although more ICU physicians (P < 0.001), supported a patient's previously expressed wish of not ending in a persistent vegetative state as the most important argument. As the case clinically progressed, a consensus regarding the arguments for decision making evolved. Conclusions:

No support was found for the hypothesis that ICU physicians care more about the quality of life of a severely ill patient. Indeed, significantly more neurosurgeons emphasized the quality-of-life aspects in this particular setting. Compared with neurosurgeons, significantly more ICU physicians considered the patient's own wishes to be important.

Keywords: Bioethics; end-of-life decision; intensive care; neurosurgery; personal autonomy; quality of life

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01452.x

Affiliations: 1: Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, Umeå University, Umeå 2: Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.16 plus tax Refund Policy

Decision making in a life-threatening cerebral condition: a comparative study of the ethical reasoning of intensive care unit physicians and neurosurgeons