New Methodology and Instrumentation for Follicular Unit Extraction: Lower Follicle Transection Rates and Expanded Patient Candidacy
Author: HARRIS, JAMES A.1
Source: Dermatologic Surgery, Volume 32, Number 1, January 2006 , pp. 56-62(7)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
James A. Harris MD, FACS has applied for a patient on the blunt punch used in this study. He has also applied for a trademark on the Safe System. BACKGROUND Follicular unit extraction (FUE), as described in the literature for harvesting follicular units, is technically demanding, has limited patient candidacy, and can potentially result in high rates of follicle transection. Although FUE has potential advantages, such as faster surgical recovery, less postoperative pain, less noticeable scarring, and possible expansion of the donor area, the acceptance of the technique is limited by the problems noted above. The proposed methodology and instrumentation may allow widespread adoption of FUE. OBJECTIVE To present the SAFE (Surgically Advanced Follicular Extraction) System, a new methodology and novel instrumentation for FUE. This article presents the efficacy of this methodology and addresses patient candidacy. METHODS Twenty-two patients undergoing standard strip excision were enrolled in a pilot study to assess follicle transection rates using the SAFE System. Based on the success of the pilot study, an additional 37 patients receiving a total of 6,947 grafts were examined. Transection rates were recorded, and patients were examined for complications or adverse reactions. RESULTS The average follicle transection rate was 6.14%, with a range of 1.7% to 15%. The only adverse reaction was the occurrence of two buried grafts, resulting in inammatory subcutaneous cysts requiring excision. CONCLUSION It appears that the SAFE System provides the methodology and instrumentation to enhance current FUE techniques and expand patient candidacy. The transection rate of this method compares favorably with traditional microscope graft dissection. Physicians with a modicum of technical skills can use the technique, and there does not appear to be a significant adverse reaction rate.Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32006.x
Affiliations: 1: Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado and Hair Sciences Center of Colorado, Greenwood Village, Colorado
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content

Click here for Page Help