Sebaceous Carcinoma of the Eyelid: A Review of 14 Cases

Authors: Elizabeth F. Callahan1; David L. Appert1; Randall K. Roenigk1; George B. Bartley2

Source: Dermatologic Surgery, Volume 30, Number 8, August 2004 , pp. 1164-1168(5)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Background.

Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid is a rare tumor. Treatment can be complicated by noncontiguous spread of the tumor. Objective.

Review a series of patients with sebaceous carcinoma to illustrate clinical presentations, treatments, and outcomes. Methods.

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with sebaceous carcinoma treated at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). Results.

Fourteen patients had sufficient follow-up data available for review. Mean follow-up was 57 months (range 18–134 months). Treatment included wide local excision with frozen and permanent section control (9 patients, 64%), Mohs micrographic surgery (2 patients, 14%), external beam radiation (2 patients, 14%), and exenteration and total parotidectomy with cervical lymph node dissection (1 patient, 7%). Two patients (14%) had local recurrence of the tumor after wide local excision, and 1 patient (7%) had tumor recurrence after Mohs micrographic surgery. Conclusion.

Treatment should be chosen on the basis of the extent of the tumor and the specific needs of the patient. The mainstay of treatment of tumors without orbital involvement has been wide local excision, with the margins checked in both permanent and frozen sections, in combination with conjunctival map biopsies when warranted. Mohs micrographic surgery is an alternative that may provide tissue conservation and lower recurrence rates. Recurrence rates between treatments are difficult to assess because of the small number of cases reported in the literature. In cases with orbital involvement, exenteration may be warranted. Radiation may be useful when surgery cannot be tolerated.

ELIZABETH F. CALLAHAN, MD, DAVID L. APPERT, MD, RANDALL K. ROENIGK, MD, AND GEORGE B. BARTLEY, MD HAVE INDICATED NO SIGNIFICANT INTEREST WITH COMMERCIAL SUPPORTERS.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30348.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and 2: Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A