Variability and Resource Utilization of Bedside Three-dimensional Echocardiographic Quantitative Measurements of Left Ventricular Volume in Congenital Heart Disease

Authors: Baker, George; Flack, English1; Hlavacek, Anthony2; Chessa, Karen2; Fleming, Dawn2; Scheurer, Mark3; Shirali, Girish2

Source: Congenital Heart Disease, Volume 1, Number 6, November/December 2006 , pp. 309-314(6)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Objectives. 

This study evaluated the variability and time resource utilization of bedside 3-dimensional echocardiographic left ventricular volume analysis (3D-LVVA) in congenital heart disease (CHD). Background. 

There are currently limited data on the resource utilization and variability of 3D-LVVA in the CHD. Methods. 

Four reviewers of varying experience levels were timed performing 15 on-scanner 3D-LVVAs. Inter- and intraobserver variability for left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), and ejection fraction (LVEF) was evaluated. Results. 

Median age was 12.7 years (0.6-33 years). Diagnoses were: normal (n = 4), cardiomyopathy (n = 4), ventricular septal defect (n = 2), and atrioventricular canal, tricuspid atresia, bicuspid aortic valve, left ventricular hypertrophy, and heart transplant (n = 1 each). For interobserver variability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for all possible combinations of reviewers were: LVEDV, 0.991-0.999 (P < .01); LVESV, 0.98-0.99 (P < .01); LVEF, 0.95-0.98 (P < .01). Bland-Altman plot mean differences (±2SD) were: LVEDV, −3 ± 14%; LVESV, −5.4 ± 21.4%; LVEF, 1.2 ± 14.7%. Interobserver variability of LVESV was not dependent on ventricular volumes (P = .25; r2 = 0.01) or heart rate (P = .43; r2 = 0.003). For intraobserver variability, ICCs for 2 reviewers were LVEDV, 0.99, 0.99 (P < .01); LVESV, 0.99, 0.99 (P < .01); and LVEF, 0.94, 0.94 (P < .01), respectively. Bland-Altman plot mean differences (±2SD) were: LVEDV, −1 ± 9.2%; LVESV, 0 ± 19.6%; LVEF, −2.2 ± 24%. Conclusion. 

Reviewers with varying experience levels can accomplish 3D-LVVA at the bedside with acceptable inter- and intraobserver reproducibility, providing the rationale for integrating 3D-LVVA into the care of CHD patients.

Keywords: Three-dimensional Echocardiography; Left Ventricular Volume Analysis; Resource Utilization; Interobserver Variability; Intraobserver Variability

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2006.00053.x

Affiliations: 1: College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; 2: Pediatric Cardiology and 3: The Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass, USA

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.16 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A