Safety versus success in elective single embryo transfer: women's preferences for outcomes of in vitro fertilisation

Authors: Scotland; McNamee1; Peddie2; Bhattacharya2

Source: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Volume 114, Number 8, August 2007 , pp. 977-983(7)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Objective

To assess whether women waiting to undergo in vitro fertilisation (IVF) view adverse outcomes associated with twin pregnancy as more desirable than having no pregnancy at all. Design

Women's preference values for five adverse birth outcomes associated with twin pregnancy were compared with their preference value for treatment failure (TF), i.e. no pregnancy at all. Setting

Aberdeen Fertility Centre, University of Aberdeen, UK. Population

A total of 74 women waiting to undergo IVF. Methods

The standard gamble method was used to elicit women's preference values for giving birth to a child with physical impairments (PI), cognitive impairments (CI), or visual impairments (VI), perinatal death (PD) without a subsequent pregnancy, premature delivery (PremD), and TF (no pregnancy). Main outcome measures

Preference values were elicited on a scale where 1 represents giving birth to a healthy child and 0 represents immediate death. Results

The median preference values for having a child with PI, CI, or VI were 0.940, 0.970, and 0.975, respectively. The median values for PremD, PD, and TF were 0.955, 0.725, and 0.815, respectively. Having no child at all was valued significantly lower than having a child with PI, CI, or VI (P < 0.01) but significantly higher than PD (P < 0.01). Conclusions

Some women waiting for IVF treatment view severe child disability outcomes associated with double embryo transfer as being more desirable than having no child at all. Women embarking on IVF may be influenced more strongly by considerations of `treatment success' rather than future risks to their offspring.

Keywords: IVF; multiple pregnancy; patient preferences; single embryo transfer

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01396.x

Affiliations: 1: Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK 2: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.16 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A