Optimal bedside urinalysis for the detection of proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy: a study of diagnostic accuracy

Authors: Waugh, Jason J.S.1; Bell, Stephen C.1; Kilby, Mark D.2; Blackwell, Claire N.1; Seed, Paul3; Shennan, Andrew H.3; Halligan, Aidan W.F.1

Source: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Volume 112, Number 4, April 2005 , pp. 412-417(6)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Objective 

To compare semi-quantitative visual and automated methods of urine testing with fully quantitative point of care urinalysis for the detection of significant proteinuria (0.3 g/24 hours) in pregnancy complicated by hypertension. Design 

A prospective comparative study. Setting 

A large teaching maternity hospital. Sample 

One hundred and seventy-one pregnant women referred to the obstetric day-care unit for assessment of newly arisen hypertension. Methods 

Early morning urine specimens were tested with four dipstick techniques (Multistix 8SG visual and automated and microalbumin/creatinine ratio visual and automated; Bayer, Elkhart, USA) as well as a fully quantitative measure of the microalbumin creatinine ratio with the DCA 2000 (a point of care assay for albumin; Bayer). These results were compared to a 24-hour urine protein measurement and measures of diagnostic accuracy/prediction are reported. Main outcome measures 

Significant proteinuria (≥0.3 g/24 hours) measured by laboratory assay. Results 

Automated dipstick urinalysis using the Clinitek 50 has significantly better predictive values for significant proteinuria (LR+ 4.27, 95% CI 2.78 to 6.56; LR 0.225, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.37) than conventional visual dipstick urinalysis (LR+ 2.27, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.51; LR 0.635, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.82). Dipstick microalbumin/creatinine ratio testing did not improve overall detection rates with automated or visual testing. Fully quantitative point of care measurement of albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) was significantly better than any dipstick technique (LR+ 14.6, 95% CI 6.74 to 31.8; LR 0.069, 95% CI 0.030 to 0.16). Conclusions 

This study confirms that in pregnancy automated dipstick urinalysis is a more accurate screening test for the detection of proteinuria than visual testing. ACR testing can offer a significant improvement over conventional urinalysis if a fully quantitative method of detection is employed that uses pregnancy-specific thresholds. Dipstick assessment of ACR does not improve the detection rate of significant proteinuria.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00455.x

Affiliations: 1: Reproductive Science Section, Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, UK 2: Department of Maternal/Fetal Medicine, Division of Reproduction and Child Health, Birmingham Women's Hospital, University of Birmingham, UK 3: Maternal and Fetal Health Research Group, St Thomas' Hospital, GKT College, London, UK

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.16 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A