A comparison of outpatient hysteroscopy with saline infusion hysterosonography

Authors: Rogerson, Lynne1; Bates, Jane2; Weston, Mike2; Duffy, Sean1

Source: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Volume 109, Number 7, July 2002 , pp. 800-804(5)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Objectives

To establish the accuracy of saline infusion hysterosonography in diagnosing uterine pathology when compared with outpatient hysteroscopy. Design

Prospective, parallel, blinded comparative study. Setting

Outpatient hysteroscopy clinic in a large university teaching hospital. Population

All women referred for outpatient hysteroscopy in a 15-month period. Interventions

Women underwent saline infusion hysterosonography followed by flexible hysteroscopy. The ultrasonographer was blinded to the hysteroscopy result and the gynaecologist was blinded to the saline infusion hysterosonography result. Main outcome measures

The relative success rates and pain scores for each procedure. The validity of saline infusion hysterosonography as a diagnostic test. Results

One hundred and seventeen women entered the study; 70 women were premenopausal and 47 postmenopausal. In 27 women, one or both procedures could not be performed. Saline infusion hysterosonography failed in 20 women, on one occasion hysteroscopy failed and both investigations failed in six women. Ninety cases remained for direct comparison, with 78 cases of agreement on the uterine findings in both investigations. Twelve cases disagreed; in one case, an adhesion was seen, two cases with polyps and five with fibroids seen on ultrasound but not seen on hysteroscopy. There were four cases where polyps were identified on hysteroscopy but not on saline infusion hysterosonography. The median pain scores were 1.6 for saline infusion hysterosonography and 3.2 for hysteroscopy. Conclusions

Both saline infusion hysterosonography and hysteroscopy are well tolerated by women. Saline infusion hysterosonography has a high failure rate but has a lower pain score than hysteroscopy.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01478.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds UK 2: Department of Ultrasound, Lincoln Wing, St James's University Hospital, Leeds UK

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.16 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A