Deficiency of glycosylphosphatidyl inositol-anchored proteins in patients with aplastic anaemia does not affect response to immunosuppressive therapy

Authors: Lord, Corinne De1; Tooze, Jennifer A.1; Saso, Radovan1; Marsh, Judith C. W.1; Gordon-Smith, Edward C.1

Source: British Journal of Haematology, Volume 101, Number 1, April 1998 , pp. 90-93(4)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Deficient expression of glycosylphosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-anchored proteins in aplastic anaemia (AA) patients has previously been reported to be associated with a poor response to immunosuppressive (IS) therapy. Here we report the response to IS therapy of 111 patients with AA and correlate this with GPI-anchored protein expression on peripheral blood cells by flow cytometry. A GPI-anchored protein deficient population was identified in 15% (17/111) of patients with AA who had a negative Ham's test and no laboratory evidence of haemolysis. Patients were treated with antilymphocyte globulin and/or cyclosporin A, or oxymetholone. Bone marrow transplantation was performed in 12 patients, seven of whom had not responded to IS therapy. In patients tested for GPI-anchored protein expression prior to IS therapy there was no difference in response rate to IS therapy between AA patients with a GPI-anchored protein deficiency and those with normal GPI-anchored protein expression (50% response rate versus 75%, respectively). Survival in these two groups was similar at 90% with follow-up over 140 months from diagnosis. Eight of the 17 AA patients who developed a GPI-anchored protein-deficient population later went on to develop a positive Ham's test. From this study we demonstrate a lower incidence of GPI-anchored protein deficiency in AA patients compared with previous reports. In addition we have shown that the presence of a GPI-anchored protein-deficient cell population in patients with AA who have a negative Ham's test is not a poor prognostic factor in terms of response and survival after IS therapy.

Keywords: aplastic anaemia; GPI-anchored proteins; immunosuppressive therapy; response

Document Type: Original article

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00660.x

Affiliations: 1: Division of Haematology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.39 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A