IngentaConnect The usual medical care for irritable bowel syndrome

Authors: Whitehead, W. E.¹; Levy, R. L.²; Von Korff, M.³; Feld, A. D.; Palsson, O. S.¹; Turner, M.¹; Drossman, D. A.¹

Source: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Volume 20, Numbers 11-12, December 2004 , pp. 1305-1315(11)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Abstract:

Summary Aims

: To determine what constitutes usual medical care for irritable bowel syndrome, which patient characteristics influence choice of treatment and how satisfied patients are with care. Methods

: Patient encounters in a health maintenance organization were prospectively monitored to identify visits coded irritable bowel syndrome, abdominal pain, constipation or diarrhoea. Within 2 weeks these patients were sent postal questionnaires (n = 1770, 59% participation) to assess patient characteristics and treatment recommendations. Responders were sent follow-up questionnaires 6 months later (77% participation) to assess adherence and satisfaction with treatment. Results

: Treatments employed most frequently were dietary advice, explanation, exercise advice, reassurance, advice to reduce stress and antispasmodic medications. Primary care physicians and gastroenterologists provided similar treatments. Patient confidence was higher for lifestyle advice (63-67, 100-point scale) than for medications (46-59). However, adherence was greater for medications (62-79 vs. 59-69, 100-point scale). Satisfactory relief was reported by 57%, but only 22% reported that symptom severity was reduced by half. Usual medical treatment was less effective for irritable bowel syndrome than for constipation, diarrhoea, or abdominal pain. Conclusions

: Usual medical care for irritable bowel syndrome emphasizes education and lifestyle modification more than drugs; patients have a greater expectation of benefit from lifestyle modification than drugs. Overall 57% of irritable bowel syndrome patients report satisfactory relief.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02256.x

Affiliations: 1: Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA 2: School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 3: Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA

You have access to the full text article on a website external to Ingentaconnect.

Please click here to view this article on InterScience.

You may be required to register and activate access on InterScience before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please contact onlinehelp@oxon.blackwellpublishing.com