Surface Electrocardiography and Histologic Rejection Following Orthotopic Heart Transplantation

Authors: Robert E. Eckart1; Mark W. Kolasa1; Nancy A. Khan1; Michael D. Kwan1; Mark E. Peele1

Source: Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Volume 10, Number 1, January 2005 , pp. 60-64(5)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Background: Intraventricular conduction delay and QT interval dispersion may be related to electrical instability and the risk of ventricular arrhythmogenesis. The interlead variability of the QT interval on a surface 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) has been associated with an increased likelihood of sudden death in patients with long QT syndromes, in patients recovering from myocardial infarction, and dilated cardiomyopathy. We sought to determine the incidence of increased QTc dispersion (QTc-d) relative to biopsy grade of severity of rejection.

Methods: Records of patients having undergone orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) were reviewed focusing specifically on surface ECGs performed in temporal proximity to endomyocardial biopsy.

Results: Seventy-five patients were evaluated on 1573 occasions, to include 999 surface ECGs, and 847 endomyocardial biopsies. There were 269 interpretable surface ECGs and endomyocardial biopsies performed within 1.1 ± 4.6 days. There were no identifiable trends in atrioventricular or intraventricular conduction abnormalities (to include right bundle branch block) when comparing those with and without significant rejection on endomyocardial biopsy. The mean QTc-d of those with none (n = 34), mild (n = 194), moderate (n = 39), and severe (n = 2) rejection was 49 ± 29, 49 ± 35, 57 ± 38, 81 ± 7 ms, respectively (P = 0.28 by ANOVA of means). When comparing those with significant rejection so as to change management there was a trend toward increased dispersion (no to mild rejection, 49 ± 34 ms vs moderate to severe rejection, 59 ± 37 ms, P = 0.09).

Conclusions: In this study investigating noninvasive ventricular depolarization/repolarization and correlation to histologic manifestation of rejection, there was suggestion, but no statistical significance, of QTc-d and severity of rejection. QTc-d should not be considered a sensitive marker for OHT rejection.

A.N.E. 2005;10(1):60–64

Keywords: heart transplant; electrocardiography; repolarization

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.00601.x

Affiliations: 1: Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.39 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A